Lots of people in the spiritual world say that we are all emotionally connected. But if you can’t tell me HOW we are emotionally connected, it’s just a nice belief. Faith is believing in something you don’t understand. When you replace believing with understanding, religions and opinions don’t matter anymore.
Nassim Haramein is a physician who is causing a lot of movement in the scientific world by asking very simple questions that put into question very fundamental principles of our modern physics. The things he expose have very deep implications in our understanding of life and the Universe. It bridges the gap between spirituality and science and also bridges the gap between quantum physics and classical physics, which Einstein had been unable to achieve. He includes into his equations various concepts that other scientists prefer to just ignore. He’s the first physician to bring a science of spirituality.
Nassim Haramein has published a paper called The Schwarzschild Proton which received an award to his big surprise. This paper has the effect of a bomb-shell in the scientific community. He’s basically proving that atoms are black holes and that the Universe is within a black hole.
According to Nassim Haramein, here’s what’s wrong with the physics taught in schools
– We are ignoring 96% of the mass of the Universe and 99.99999% of our atoms… which is space!
– We are inventing a new mass and call it “dark energy” just so that the equations work
– We are inventing a new force and call it “strong force” to explain that protons stay together. Physics as you go!
– We are ignoring the fact that Quantum Physics equations say that our atoms have an infinite amount of energy
– Our concept of dimensions is flawed
– We talk about the expansion of the Universe and ignore the fact that for every reaction there is an equal and opposite reaction
– Modern science can’t explain spiritual experiences. Nassim Haramein is bridging the gap between spirituality and science.
– Much more.
This conference is a MUST SEE!! It will change your current understanding of life.
Do NOT watch this video if you have a physics exam to pass.
This is the science of spirituality in simple terms that anyone can understand.
Get our best-selling e-book Sexual Magnetism Blueprint, previously sold $147, now for FREE!
#1 by Monica on May 13, 2011 - 3:25 pm
Quote
Haramein is amazing! However, we still believe we have emotions created by feelings…and yes all of that is energy but at some point we have to understand that we are human and that’s the beauty of it all. Our atoms, space, and energy are all that creates this Universe, and all of that is not able to feel what we, the animals feel. Dogs, turtles, and birds, and even fish know fear and other emotions that us humans go through. We create energy based on our emotions which emotion = in motion.
#2 by Etienne Charland on May 13, 2011 - 3:26 pm
Quote
I take the link between emotions and energies for granted, but you’re right… this isn’t even mentioned in the conference yet it is a crucial point.
#3 by Monica on May 13, 2011 - 3:26 pm
Quote
He doesn’t highlight emotions because he is a scientist. Mother Earth though, has a way to remind us how wonderful it is to live here. That’s just in my opinion based on research and my own feelings.
#4 by Bobathon on May 18, 2011 - 10:16 pm
Quote
He’s not causing movement in the science world. He’s causing a movement only in the new age world; the science world are dismissing him. Have a look for scientists who mention him.
His Schwarzschild Proton paper was not a bomb-shell in the scientific community. It was unanimously denounced as fakery and a joke. Have a look for discussions of it on science forums. Find a scientist and ask them.
If you like what he does, feel free to publicise it – but if you can’t do it without deceit, something is wrong.
#5 by Etienne Charland on May 21, 2011 - 1:48 pm
Quote
Looking at your article…
1a. Nassim Haramein didn’t invent the fact that the quantum physics equations give an infinite amount of energy until it is renormalized.
1b. If you don’t start from the point that “we’re all one with the universe”, it fails to explain the distance healing that I’m doing with tons of people.
I present results.
2a. The definition of the law “For every action there is an equal and opposite re-action” clearly states “for EVERY force”. Why would this apply to some forces and not others? The expansion of the Universe IS a force.
2b. Not sure what the arguments are… you just mentioned vague beliefs about things every scientists know they don’t know.
2c. This has nothing to do with the content of what he says.
2d. Colliders aren’t built to look for black holes, they’re looking for the so-called “God particle”. However, I’ve seen publications in a serious science magazine last summer that they were preparing experiment to try to detect the Hawking Radiation (emanations from a black hole) within atoms, within air and within water.
#6 by Bobathon on May 26, 2011 - 9:38 pm
Quote
1a. No, he didn’t invent everything. He’s picked up a few of the random things that anyone can find in popular science books etc. What he did do was to completely misinterpret the infinities. Which is understandable, as he doesn’t understand the mathematics (he’s said so himself, but it’s obvious to anyone who does).
1b. I don’t doubt your talents. If you have results (as opposed to claims and subjective anecdotes), then please do present them. As it happens, I do believe we’re all one with the universe. But I believe we owe it to the universe to find out what it’s like honestly, to look deeply and to ask difficult questions. Not fabricate it, wrap it in a pretty crowd-pleasing package and sell it to the public as Haramein does.
2a. Two very clear reasons. Firstly, this is the law as Newton presented it in 1687. The 20th Century has revealed numerous phenomena that depart from Newtonian mechanics, in particular at cosmological scales, at speeds approaching that of light, and at or below the atomic scale. The expansion of the universe is not in the realm in which Newton’s laws operate normally. Secondly, and most importantly, the expansion of the Universe is not a force. If something is expanding, it will quite happily carry on expanding without any forces being present. Expansion is a state of relative motion, and motion does not require a force. Look at Newton’s First Law.
2b. I’ve tried to be as clear as I can. I made three points. I’m sorry if you don’t follow it. What are these “things every scientist know they don’t know”?
2c. Haramein’s nonsensical claims that he’s on the verge of being accepted are very relevant to his appeal. But not to the content of what he says, you’re right. Still, worth noting that what he claims never actually comes about.
2d. The LHC was not built to look for the “God particle” or anything specific. It was built to investigate and explore the nature of matter under certain conditions. But they are, as I said in the blog, looking for tiny black holes, which have nothing to do with anything of Haramein’s. You’re right, they will do this by looking for the Hawking radiation.
If Hawking radiation is a real phenomenon for all black holes, then a single Haramein’s Schwarzschild Proton would constantly emit deadly gamma rays at a rate of 455 megawatts, as I explained in my article (which you can find if you search for schproton). This would be enough to kill anyone outright from within a distance of half a mile. From a single proton.
The fact that all conclusions derived from Haramein’s work are so utterly nonsensical and unlike the the world around us surely says something about his theories, and his inability and unwillingness to investigate them for himself. I’m still waiting for someone to provide a counterexample. Let me know if you have any.
#7 by Etienne Charland on May 26, 2011 - 9:48 pm
Quote
Most of what I do is utterly against most mainstream notions in every possible way, from emotional inter-connectedness, to animal magnetism, to healing diseases, to Alchemy, to independent spiritual thinking, to philosophies of life. Yet, I can make anyone in front of me feel energies within 30 seconds. It’s the best way to close a debate about whether energies exist or not.
I could spend my time trying to prove that it’s possible to heal a cancer through alchemical healing, or I could spend the same time learning how to do it. I’d rather spend my time doing miracles into people’s lives than convincing skeptics.
#8 by Bobathon on May 30, 2011 - 7:30 pm
Quote
I’m not arguing against your energies, Etienne. I’ve made that very clear. I haven’t even mentioned energies. I’m not representing ‘mainstream notions’, nor have I mentioned them or relied on them at all. Why are you pretending that I’m attacking things I’ve never even mentioned?
I was arguing against your article and its claims about Haramein. Because they are false. That’s all.
Pingback: The veil between the energetic and physical worlds