Here’s more important fundamental changes happening right now. Nassim Haramein’s paper on the The Schwartzschild Proton has just been approved and published in the American Institute of Physics magazine a few days ago! This means his radically different physics theories are now entering mainstream science. This marks the end of Quantum Physics and Classical Physics. We’re now entering a new realm of physics that contains it all with the Unified Field Theory.
This was published at the same time they found out that the galaxy had HUGE bubbles of gas above and under it. They thought the galaxy was flat and modern physics absolutely can’t explain this.
This matches the Unified Fields models elaborated by Nassim Haramein. This marks a new era for science. This bridges the gap between spirituality and science with the Unified Field Theory.
Here’s a presentation from Nassim Haramein in Australia last summer.
Enjoy!
Get our best-selling e-book Sexual Magnetism Blueprint, previously sold $147, now for FREE!
#1 by Colin on December 12, 2010 - 10:59 pm
Quote
WOW that’s Huge news.. Was it me who tipped you off to Nassim?
I went to see him fall 2009 in Joshua Tree california when he gave his Resonance Project delegates program.
Thanks for letting me know about it..
Though I suspect I’ll be hearing about it via Nassim’s FB page..
Cheers,
Colin
#2 by Etienne Charland on December 13, 2010 - 1:08 pm
Quote
I knew about him from some people around here who do a lot of researches and project around energies.
#3 by Michael on December 13, 2010 - 1:05 pm
Quote
I taught high school geometry for a few months which I actually really enjoyed. For one thing I enjoyed the subject matter. Geometry is very interesting. One thing I found out about that you might find interesting I know you were into those hassim narassim (forgot his name I’ll have to check him out again) videos, is undefined terms which are points lines and planes. (The real teacher when she got back -I was a sub- was disappointed they didn’t know this term, but what the hell are those words going to mean to those kids anyways. I’d bet that teacher probably doesn’t even know why those words undefined terms are even important she just teaches whatever is in the book. There is way too much vocabulary I thought. Never mind undefined terms I wanted to say as long as they know how to calculate the longest side of a right triangle they’ll be just fine. But of course I kept my mouth shut because I’m a polite guy and its not a big deal anyway.) But anyways in Euclid’s original book the Elements, from thousands of years ago, that highschool geometry is mostly based on, points lines and planes were defined and Geometry was a rigid structure (my own interpretation). There was one postulate (statement taken to be obvious) in his book that was a problem for a lot of people for a long time. I don’t remember exactly how it went but it has to do with parallel lines. Basically long story short they didn’t “get things to work” until they changed points lines and planes into undefined terms in the 1800s. Which I guess means… they don’t mean anything! Supposedly with any theory in geometry you should be able to replace these terms with any other terms. A triangle is composed of three palmys which all lie on the same natural grounding and meet to form three Phukets. Haha its such nonsense. Its like playing madlibs. Supposedly this changed the foundation of mathematics and led to modern math. I don’t know much about the specific implications of this but what it means to me is that contrary to what many people may think mathematics is fluid. It’s not something passed down from God like many people think the bible is too. Think about it for a minute one of the most basic concepts in mathematics is that there are these things that are undefined and have been proven that they can never be defined. It was the crowning achievement of logical people when they proved logically that its all illogical! The funny thing about it is that this gives me way more appreciation for math. Just like I got more appreciation for what rion teaches as I realized that he was just making it all up (the logical part of what he teaches). Alot of people don’t get what he teaches or got angry at him when they realized that what he teaches isn’t absolute logical truth, he’s just making it up having fun with it. But how do you teach something logically to people that is illogical? The thing is now I believe in absolute truth where before I didn’t. But absolute truth isn’t logical its illogical. Logical truth is all relative.
Wow…. I actually did not mean to get into all that right now. I just meant to say I found geometry interesting lol. I just looked into all this stuff so that I could get excited about it and be a better teacher. I didn’t teach any of this stuff to my kids they would’ve definitely dragged me off in a straight jacket I think haha (the simpler something is the harder a time people usually have understanding it-). I just stuck to the book. They don’t need to know all that other stuff anyways and I don’t know what I’m talking about well enough to explain it. Plus 90% of them probably wouldn’t care. I just got myself excited about teaching it, even the every day stuff. That was the other thing I really liked about teaching probably even more was encouraging people. I just wanted everyone in my class to be successful and enjoy themselves. Natural grounding helped too. And the kids have so much energy at that age its crazy.
#4 by Etienne Charland on December 13, 2010 - 1:10 pm
Quote
How do you feel about teaching stuff you know to be wrong 🙂 Kids are much better at understanding simple things than adults are… this should be thought to children! Adults just need some time to adapt before that…
#5 by Monica on December 13, 2010 - 1:20 pm
Quote
Regarding: Sacred Geometry & Unified Fields…wow, great stuff! Also, this man is well balanced…you can sense it. The energy, wisdom, life balance, and confidence is quite attractive…something that is immeasurable to the essence of human life and existence. Now will you call this authentic masculinity? Hehehe…acutally, I am serious. It’s admirable how confident this man is and he is a scientist…with humor and terms I can understand w/o falling asleep. I have to go back and view the entire message but so the far 1 & 2 are pretty great. Thanks for sharin’!
#6 by Jared on December 22, 2010 - 12:46 pm
Quote
Haramein studied ancient civilizations too.
There are pyramids in Europe, Bosnia, that is a quite
recent discovery. Perhaps the largest pyramid
so far. We don?t know details yet.
This is fascinating.
#7 by Vijay on March 24, 2011 - 2:14 am
Quote
I saw one of Nassim’s videos of an 8 hr or so lecture and was really impressed in the way he conducted himself and put forward his views. I have actually given a lot of thought to his theory of the universe being a black hole (coz light can’t escape out of the universe!). I mean it sounds very logical. I am an Indian chap and a lot of what Nassim presents is already written in ancient Indian sciences…the nature of existence…the theory of consciousness creating matter…that big bangs are continuous creations…that space and time are essentially tools to experience ourselves/oneness/nothingness…that infinity can only be experienced by introducing relativity (Michael your point about there being an absolute entity). Infinity/Nothingness is the only absolute but the absolute can only be experienced if there is something that is not-absolute which is why relativity as a tool for experience is introduced into existence.)
I think there is way more knowledge in ancient sciences than we give them credit for. The biggest problem is that some idiots in the 18th century decided these ancient texts were not meaningful because their minds were incapable of understanding them (how could they? These idiots believed the earth was 6000 yrs old…main reason for the aryan theory…how can a civilization in India exist as far back as 12,000 BC? After all God created the universe in 4004 BC, innit?). Yeah the “scientists” of the 18th century and the Historians/Archeologists were slightly different in their beliefs of the 6000 yr-Universe but they had a common belief that no civilization as advanced as theirs existed till then. And those theories have stuck since then…mainstream science/archeology does not even question those assumptions.
In addition to Nassim’s view I would recommend you guys to watch Peter Russell’s lecture on the primacy of consciousness…its a pure beaut! http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7799171063626430789#
Enough of that rant.
#8 by teermaBem on July 6, 2011 - 5:15 pm
Quote
Nice Post. This enter helped me in my college assignment. Thnaks Alot
#9 by dan winter on March 7, 2012 - 12:06 am
Quote
how (nassim’s) stellated tetra becomes fractal & implosive
jitterbug to icos/dodec
goldenmean.info/selforganization
#10 by Mahitable Knudsen on June 16, 2012 - 9:01 pm
Quote
Look what you have done, now I must find him and see the other parts of this presentation. wow Thanks.
#11 by Gilles P?tro on October 9, 2012 - 9:16 am
Quote
simply amazing awesome.
#12 by Guilherme S Silva on December 16, 2012 - 4:37 pm
Quote
The "American Institute of Physics magazine" is not a peer reviewed publication.
#13 by Dave Koch on February 6, 2013 - 5:05 am
Quote
You think any peer review publications would approve his stuff?
#14 by Pete on January 8, 2013 - 4:43 am
Quote
It’s hilarious and also slightly worrying how easily people are suckered into believing faff like this.
Haramein’s paper was neither peer-reviewed nor published by the AIP. The AIP simply listed the conference proceedings of which Haramein attended and was given an Best New Paper award by a panel of non-physicists, which in all fairness means absolutely nothing – never mind marking the end of classical and quantum physics.
This story is of course two years old, and the fact that classical and quantum physics are still very much alive and Haramein’s paper is anything but ‘mainstream science’ speaks volumes about the veracity of this article.
#15 by Carol Steve on February 19, 2013 - 2:16 am
Quote
I wish I had seen this sooner!
Pingback: LAAMARALL » O Sol ? um grande Stargate ?!
#16 by Neal Christopher Smith on May 18, 2014 - 9:48 pm
Quote
youtube him the rogues gallery one is the most comprehensive I think
#17 by Chris Francis on May 20, 2014 - 9:17 pm
Quote
an amazing man indeed !!!
#18 by Chris Francis on May 20, 2014 - 9:20 pm
Quote
I encourage all of you to look at this guys site I am posting here !! he is an amazing man and is changing the face of math as we know it !!! http://resonance.is/